The LTV Corporation

200 Public Square
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-2308
U.S.A.
(216) 622-5000
Fax: (216) 622-4610
Web site: http://www.ltvsteel.com

Public Company
Incorporated: 1956 as Ling Electronics, Inc.
Employees: 15,500
Sales: $4.45 billion (1997)
Stock Exchanges: New York Pacific
Ticker Symbol: LTV

SICs: 3312 Steel Works & Blast Furnaces

The LTV Corporation is the third largest steel producer in the United States. As the second largest domestic maker of flat-rolled steel, the company supplies the automotive, appliance, and electrical equipment industries. Other areas in which LTV holds leading positions include carbon electrical steels, electrolytically galvanized steel sheets, ultralow carbon steels, welded steel pipe and tubing products, electrical conduit, and tin mill products. LTV operates two integrated plants in Cleveland and East Chicago, Indiana, for the manufacture of flat-rolled steel, as well as a high-tech minimill in Decatur, Alabama, which is operated under a joint venture—50 percent owned by LTV—with Japan’s Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. and the United Kingdom’s British Steel pic.

From Electronics Firm to Conglomerate

The man who built LTV from a small electronics firm into one of America’s largest corporations was named James J. (Jimmy) Ling. Through a process of acquisition and merger Ling created a modern corporate conglomerate.

In 1947 Jimmy Ling invested $2,000 in order to establish an electrical construction and engineering firm in Dallas. In 1956, after several successful years in business, the Ling Electric Company merged with L.M. Electronics of California and the name of the company was changed to Ling Electronics. A subsequent merger with Altec Electronics in 1959 changed the name of the company to Ling-Altec. A year later Ling-Altec merged with the Temco Electronics and Missile Company of Dallas. The new company, Ling-Temco, became one of the first major defense companies to be founded after World War II.

In 1961 Ling-Temco merged with the Chance Vought Aircraft Company. Vought was founded in 1917 and became part of the Boeing United Aircraft conglomerate in 1929. After that organization was forced to break up in 1934, Vought became a division of United Aircraft (later United Technologies). A conflict of interest in manufacturing led to United Aircraft’s sale of Vought in 1954. Seven years later Ling initiated a difficult takeover of Vought which resulted in his temporary (but voluntary) loss of control over the company and all but 11 shares of company stock. Upon completion of the takeover on August 16, the company’s name was again changed to Ling-Temco-Vought.

Ling’s notion of what constituted a successful conglomerate was based on the idea that no division should account for more than 30 percent of the company’s sales. In addition, concentration of the company’s business in related fields was to be avoided at all costs. It was for that reason that Ling-Temco-Vought became interested in Wilson Foods in 1966. Wilson’s primary product was fresh meats, but it also operated two other businesses dependent upon animal byproducts: sporting goods and Pharmaceuticals. The sporting goods division made (among other things) footballs from pigskin and tennis rackets from animal guts, and the Pharmaceuticals division derived hormones, steroids, and other drugs from animal organs. Wilson’s president, Roscoe Haynie, knew nothing of Ling’s takeover effort until two weeks before it was completed. By January 5, 1967, Ling-Temco-Vought had acquired control of Wilson, and Haynie agreed to move to Dallas and work for Ling. That same year Ling-Temco-Vought was listed number 14 in the Fortune 500 ranking with annual sales of over $1 billion.

Ling divided Wilson into three operating divisions: Wilson & Company (meat), Wilson Sporting Goods, and Wilson Pharmaceutical & Chemical, and shares of stock in the three divisions were sold to the public. On Wall Street the share offerings were greeted with some skepticism. Despite this skepticism, Ling believed the parts of the company were worth more separately than together, and in time he was proven correct. Before long Ling-Temco-Vought’s remaining share of the three Wilson companies was worth more than its initial investment.

Ling-Temco-Vought’s growth in the five years from 1965 to 1969 was impressive. In 1965 the company had total sales of $36 million. In 1969 that figure had grown by more than 100 times to $3.8 billion. This growth was made possible through “redeployment,” Ling’s term for offering a minority share of a Ling-Temco-Vought division’s stock to the public. Under favorable market conditions, private investors would drive up the price of the stock. This provided Ling-Temco-Vought with more collateral to support larger bank loans which were, in turn, used to finance more takeovers.

In 1968 Ling-Temco-Vought acquired the Greatamerica Corporation from Dallas investor Troy Post in return for $95 million in debentures. Greatamerica was the parent company for Braniff Airways, National Car Rental, and a number of insurance companies. Later that same year the company purchased a majority interest in the Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation of Pittsburgh. Ling-Temco-Vought’s numerous acquisitions led the U.S. Justice Department to initiate an antitrust investigation. Ling managed to avoid a federal lawsuit by agreeing to sell Braniff and the Okonite division, which was acquired in 1965. Despite the legal battles, Ling’s strategy of redeployment had been successful.

Divestments Began in 1969

Unfortunately, redeployment had an even more serious detrimental effect under unfavorable market conditions. When the economy began to decline in 1969 Ling-Temco-Vought’s growth abruptly halted. The company was forced to divest itself of several divisions in order to generate enough cash to compensate for its growing debt. Wilson Sporting Goods was sold for $8.7 million and Wilson Pharmaceuticals was sold to American Can for $16 million. Investors subsequently lost confidence in Ling-Temco-Vought. The same stock that traded for $167 in 1967 was now worth $11.

In May 1970 Ling-Temco-Vought’s board of directors voted to remove Ling from the chairmanship. Robert Stewart was named interim chairman until a permanent replacement for Ling could be found. Ling was demoted to president, a position where he had no control over company policy. Six weeks later Ling resigned from the corporation. The board elected W. Paul Thayer of Ling-Temco-Vought’s Aerospace division to become the company’s new president and, a few months later, its chairman.

Thayer’s first objective was to dispose of Ling-Temco-Vought’s unprofitable divisions and remove all the others from public trading. Ling-Temco-Vought, which had until this time been more of an investment portfolio than a holding company, was to be converted into an operating company directly involved with its subsidiaries. This reorganization allowed one of the company’s divisions to help another financially, something that was not possible under Ling.

Ling-Temco-Vought’s debt was restructured and a campaign to acquire the privately held shares of the company’s divisions was launched. On May 5, 1971, Ling-Temco-Vought became The LTV Corporation. Later that month the company acquired the remaining shares of Vought Aircraft from private investors. The investors received $3.2 million and two former Ling-Temco-Vought subsidiaries, LTV Ling Altec (the Altec Corporation) and LTV Electrosystems (now called E-Systems). By November 1974 LTV had also acquired the minority interests of Wilson & Company and Jones & Laughlin Steel.

LTV’s Vought division was subcontracted to manufacture tail sections for a number of aircraft, including Boeing’s 747 and McDonnell Douglas’s DC-10 and KC-10. Vought also manufactured the A-7 Corsair II fighter and the S-3A antisubmarine airplane. In the mid-1970s, however, Vought’s ability to generate a consistent profit was undermined by the Pentagon when it eliminated Vought from several lucrative defense contracts. Vought then attempted to enter civilian markets when it engineered a $34 million “Airtrans” ground transportation system for the Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport. The project was mired in controversy from its inception and a series of problems led Vought to declare a $22.6 million loss on the project. Subsequent orders for the A-7 from the Defense department and the governments of Greece and Pakistan, as well as a contract to produce Lance surface-to-surface missiles, helped to keep Vought in business.

By 1977 LTV was reduced to three principal lines of business: steel (Jones & Laughlin), meatpacking (Wilson), and aerospace (Vought). All three lines of business were cyclical (experiencing alternating periods of good and bad market conditions). In 1977 all three of LTV’s divisions were suffering from the adverse conditions in their respective markets. LTV lost $39 million on sales of $4.7 billion.

Acquired Lykes Corporation in 1978

At this time Paul Thayer made a move more characteristic of something Ling would have done. He announced LTV’s intention to purchase the Lykes Corporation of New Orleans. Lykes was the parent company of Continental-Emsco, a petroleum equipment supply and service company; the Lykes Brothers Steamship Company, a cargo shipping company; and Youngs-town Sheet & Tube, a financially troubled steel finishing plant. As part of the merger agreement LTV (which was already $ 1 billion in debt) would also become responsible for Lykes’s debt of $659 million.

Upon closer inspection, however, the proposed merger was regarded as quite promising. The Youngstown mill could produce steel less expensively with raw steel from the Jones & Laughlin plant in Aliquippa, Pennsylvania. In addition, transportation costs could be reduced and Jones & Laughlin could transfer its backlogged orders to Youngstown’s underutilized plants at Indiana Harbor.

The Justice Department had suspected the merger on antitrust grounds until Attorney General Griffin Bell interceded. Bell held a thorough investigation and later declared that Lykes had no chance of surviving without the merger. Despite considerable opposition from Senator Edward Kennedy (who questioned Bell’s authority in the matter), Bell overruled the Justice Department and approved the merger, which was completed on December 5, 1978. The new division was renamed J&L Steel.

In 1981 LTV attempted to perform a similar expansion of its aerospace division. This time the takeover target was the Grumman Corporation. However, opposition from Grumman was considerable. The Federal Trade Commission arranged for an injunction on further purchases of Grumman stock by LTV on the grounds that a merger of the two companies would be anticompetitive in the carrier-based aircraft field. In addition, Grumman’s pension fund and an employee investment group (who already held 35 percent of the company’s stock) began buying large amounts of Gruirían stock and refused to tender them for an LTV bid. This invited the interest of the U.S. Labor Department, which was concerned about fiduciary improprieties. Even the company’s founder, 86-year-old Leroy Grumman, came out of retirement to campaign for his company’s independence. What LTV may have underestimated most was the fierce loyalty of Grumman’s employees to their company. Yet it was a U.S. Court of Appeals which prevented LTV’s bid from being successful when it ruled against the takeover on antitrust grounds.

Without the additional resources of Grumman, LTV’s Vought division was forced to re-equip itself with new equipment in order to meet its 15-year $4 billion contract to produce a Multiple Launch Rocket System for the Defense department. It was a very costly investment which left LTV with liquidity problems at a very bad time.

Sold Wilson in 1981

LTV sold its Wilson subsidiary in June 1981 (before the Grumman bid) in order to generate cash. The Wilson division’s share of revenue was quickly replaced, however, by the newly reorganized Continental-Emsco subsidiary. LTV officials claimed to have known in advance that the profitable Continental-Emsco division was about to experience a period of adverse market conditions. According to LTV’s president Ray Hay, however, “the business came down so fast we didn’t have time to shut off our subcontractors.” As a result, Continental-Emsco was left with a year’s inventory and was forced to report a substantial operating loss.

Ray Hay came to LTV in 1975 from the Xerox Corporation. He left Xerox out of frustration at being passed over for that company’s presidency. At the time, Paul Thayer was looking for a man of Hay’s talent and ability to be LTV’s next president. Hay accepted Thayer’s invitation, and when Thayer left LTV in January 1983 to serve as Deputy Defense Secretary, Hay was elected CEO and chairman of the board.

Thayer’s tenure at the Defense Department was shortened in 1985 when he and a Dallas stockbroker named Billy Bob Harris were convicted of obstructing a federal investigation into the illegal use of privileged information. The “insider trading” scheme involved LTV and two other companies on whose boards Thayer served during 1981 and 1982.

In 1983 LTV sold the Lykes Steamship division and reorganized the remaining subsidiaries into three product-oriented divisions. The Vought Corporation was combined with a number of smaller divisions and renamed the LTV Aerospace & Defense Company. In addition, Continental-Emsco became the LTV Energy Products Company.

Acquired Republic Steel in 1984

The following year LTV initiated a takeover of Republic Steel. The company was pleased with the relative success of its Jones & Laughlin/Youngstown merger and believed that by absorbing Republic it could achieve similar results. The Justice Department, however, withheld its approval of the merger because the combined company would control 50 percent of the sheet steel market. In addition, the department was concerned about an impending merger between U.S. Steel and National Steel. If both mergers were allowed the two companies would control nearly half of America’s steelmaking capacity. However, a month later U.S. Steel canceled its merger with National and Jones & Laughlin was given permission to merge with Republic on the condition that it sell two of its sheet steel plants. On July 29, 1984, the $770 million takeover was completed with the creation of a new combined subsidiary called the LTV Steel Company.

As a condition to the merger, Republic’s chairman Bradley Jones was named CEO of LTV. Furthermore, LTV was forced to offer costly retirement settlements to Republic personnel. The compensation was so attractive that Jones himself decided to take early retirement. He was replaced by LTV’s former CEO David Hoag.

Foreign Competition Led to 1986 Bankruptcy

During this time the American steel market was inundated with inexpensive imported steel from modern plants in Japan, Europe, and Canada. In 1985 foreign producers controlled 30 percent of the domestic market. This had the effect of closing American steel plants and reducing production capacity to between 50 and 60 percent.

Attempts to modernize LTV Steel and raise productivity had limited success. At the Aliquippa Works manhours per ton of steel went from eight in 1981 to 3.8 in 1985. And while the company’s investments in modernized facilities were generating an annual return of three percent, the debt cost 15 percent per year to service. In effect, the investments were generating a net loss of 12 percent annually. In 1985 steel production at Aliquippa was idled and all but 700 workers (out of 9,700 in 1981) were laid off. In addition, 3,000 white collar jobs were eliminated. For the year, LTV had revenues of $8.2 billion, but posted a net loss of $724 million, the most of any company in that year’s Fortune 500.

The company’s pension fund was turned over to a federal pension insurance agency to which LTV was obligated to make contributions. When LTV requested permission to skip a $175 million payment to the fund, the U.S. government’s Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) asked for and later received a claim on LTV Aerospace for collateral. LTV initiated a $500 million divestiture of most of the nonsteel assets it acquired from Republic. In early 1986 the Gulf States Steel and LTV Specialty Products divisions were sold.

LTV was unable to maintain liquidity and on July 17, 1986, applied for protection under Chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. According to chairman Ray Hay, “We just could not generate cash flow.” Under Chapter 11 LTV was temporarily relieved of its annual $319 million debt service and $350 million pension contributions. LTV began to consider either selling its energy division or closing additional steel plants.

Operations Restructured and Modernized over Seven-Year Bankruptcy Period

LTV remained under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for almost seven years—one of the longest, and most complicated, bankruptcy cases in American history. Under Hoag’s leadership, the company’s steel operations were thoroughly overhauled. LTV closed or sold more than 30 steel plants, and shifted to a concentration on higher-priced flat-rolled steel for automobiles, appliances, and construction, exiting from the bar steel and stainless steel sectors. The company’s creditors allowed LTV to invest $2 billion to modernize its remaining steel plants and retrain workers, resulting in productivity improvements of 70 percent, with overall productivity better than the industry average. LTV also sold LTV Aerospace and Defense to Loral and Northrop/Carlyle in 1992. T>is move led to the relocation of the corporate headquarters from Dallas to Cleveland. Also in 1992, LTV received a crucial infusion of $200 million in cash from Japan’s Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd., a company that already had ties with LTV through two joint ventures.

On June 28, 1993, The LTV Corporation finally emerged from Chapter 11. The firm that emerged was predominantly a steel producer, with a small oil-drilling equipment unit, Continental Emsco Co. It had a workforce with 30,000 fewer employees than in 1986. LTV was able to emerge nearly debt-free by settling with creditors through the issuance of stock. While it was temporarily relieved of making pension contributions during the bankruptcy period, LTV had amassed a $3 billion pension shortfall by the time it emerged from bankruptcy. In an agreement with the PBGC, LTV made a cash payment of $787 million into its pension funds upon its emergence from bankruptcy, and was given 28 years to pay the remainder, amounting to a minimum of $30 million to $50 million annually. In late 1993 LTV received additional funds that it used to further reduce its pension liability when USX Corp. agreed to pay LTV $375 million to settle a lawsuit LTV had filed against Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Co., a former unit of USX, for alleged antitrust violations.

Minimills and Value-Added Products Marked Mid-1990s

In 1995 LTV became a steel-only company when it sold Continental Emsco to SCF Partners of Houston, Texas, for nearly $75 million. That same year, construction began on a minimill in Decatur, Alabama, through Trico Steel Company L.L.C., a joint venture 50 percent owned by LTV, with Sumitomo Metal and British Steel each holding 25 percent. LTV contributed $150 million to fund the venture, then borrowed another $300 million to get the minimill into production by early 1997. Minimills, which are typically nonunion, use stateof-the-art equipment and require only a few hundred workers, resulting in lower costs compared to traditional steel plants. The Trico minimill was designed with a capacity of 2.1 million tons annually, compared to the 8.4 million tons generated each year by LTV’s two integrated steel mills in Cleveland and East Chicago, Indiana. LTV said that it planned to consider building minimills in Europe and Asia once the Trico mill reached full capacity. To support Trico and perhaps other minimills, LTV in 1996 formed a joint venture in Trinidad and Tobago with Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and German engineering firm Lurgi AG to construct a plant to produce iron briquettes used in the minimill steelmaking process. LTV’s move into minimills angered the United Steelworkers of America (USWA) union, whose officials considered the Alabama plant a threat to workers at other LTV plants. But many observers noted that LTV’s workers faced the larger threat of minimills operated by other steel companies, most notably Nucor Corp., located in competitive proximity to the LTV plants.

In addition to seeking ways of making steel more profitably, Hoag made a number of moves in the mid-1990s to increase LTV’s involvement in the production of value-added steel products. In April 1997 LTV and two other integrated steel companies—Bethlehem Steel Corp. and Rouge Steel Co.—each purchased a minority stake in TWB Co., a supplier of laser-welded steel blanks to the automotive industry. That same month, LTV acquired a 25 percent interest in Lagermex S.A. de C.V., which was in the process of building an $18.5 million automotive steel processing operation in Puebla, Mexico. Also in April 1997, LTV paid $187.5 million in cash for the assets of the Varco-Pruden Buildings unit of United Dominion Industries Inc. The Memphis, Tennessee-based Varco-Pruden had eight U.S. factories and joint-venture plants in China, Brazil, and Argentina for the manufacture of low-rise steel building systems for manufacturing, warehousing, school, and commercial applications. In June 1997 J. Peter Kelly, who had been president and COO of LTV Steel since 1991, was named president and COO of The LTV Corporation, with Hoag remaining chairman and CEO.

In July 1997 LTV announced that it would close its 40-year-old, 714-employee coke-making plant in Pittsburgh after the Environmental Protection Agency found the plant in violation of pollution standards. Company officials said that bringing the plant into compliance could cost more than $400 million, an investment they did not wish to make in a facility that was on its last legs. A likely contributing factor in the decision was that minimills—perhaps the key to LTV’s future—do not use coke in their steelmaking process. The USWA filed a grievance against the company regarding its decision, but a binding arbitrator ruled in LTV’s favor. In February 1998 LTV began the plant-closing process; later that month, LTV and the USWA announced they would work jointly to seek other parties who might be interested in redeveloping the facility.

At the end of the century, LTV had made a rather remarkable comeback from the wreckage of its conglomerate past. And, ironically, it was now a single-industry firm, the very antithesis of the Jimmy Ling business philosophy. Nevertheless, the steel industry was an extraordinarily competitive one, and LTV’s future was by no means secure. Under Hoag’s steady leadership, however, LTV had returned for the time being to steady profitability through an emphasis on containing costs, using the latest technology, and moving up the steel value chain.

Principal Subsidiaries

Georgia Tubing Corporation; Investment Bankers, Inc.; Jalcite I, Inc.; Jones & Laughlin Steel Incorporated; Kingsley International Insurance Ltd.; LTV Blanking Corporation; LTV/EGL Holding Company; LTV Electro-Galvanizing, Inc.; LTV International, Inc.; LTV International N.V.; LTV Properties, Inc.; LTV Sales Finance Company; LTV Steel Company, Inc.; LTV Steel de Mexico, Ltd.; LTV-Trico, Inc.; RepSteel Overseas Finance N.V.; Trico Steel Company, Inc.; VP Buildings, Inc.

Further Reading

Adams, Chris, “LTV to Close Coke-Making Plant Amid Pressures to Cut Emissions,” Wall Street Journal. July 15, 1997, p. B4.

Baker, Stephen, “The Bridges Steel Is Building,” Business Week, June 2, 1997, p. 39.

Baker, Stephen, and Keith L. Alexander, “LTV Is Fixin’to Flatten a Few Minimills,” Business Week, August 2, 1993, p. 84D.

Byrne, Harlan S., “Tested Mettle,” Barron’s, March 17, 1997, p. 24.

Chakravarty, Subrata N., “Caught in a Steel Maze,” Forbes, March 14, 1983, pp. 150 +.

Clark, Gordon L., Pensions and Corporate Restructuring in American Industry: A Crisis of Regulation, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993, 305 p.

Dorfman, John R., “More Risk Than Reward: Times Are Tough in the Steel Industry,” Financial World, August 19, 1986, pp. 44 +.

Holusha, John, “Singing the Steelworker Blues: A Mini-Mill Deal at LTV Leaves Union Feeling Jilted,” New York Times, December 13, 1995, pp. D1, D4.

Loomis, Carol J., “U.S. Steel and LTV Find Hidden Charms in Losers,” Fortune, March 5, 1984, pp. 118 +.

LTV Looking Ahead, Dallas: The LTV Corporation, 1980.

Milbank, Dana, “LTV Begins to Emerge from Bankruptcy Proceedings,” Wall Street Journal, May 26, 1993, p. B4.

Schroeder, Michael, and Aaron Bernstein, “A Brawl with Labor Could Block LTV’s Rebirth,” Business Week, March 16, 1992, p. 40.

Smith, Frank, “Gordon Williams’Best Defense,” Dallas Business Journal, December 11, 1989, pp. 8-9.

Sobel, Robert, The Age of Giant Corporations, Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood, 1972, 257 p.

Thompson, Chris, “LTV Inks Deal for Japanese Cash Infusion,” Grain’s Cleveland Business, September 14, 1992, pp. 1 +.

_____, “Timing Crucial for LTV Rebound,” Crain’s Cleveland Business, January 25, 1993, pp. 1 +.

Wagstyl, Stefan, and Richard Waters, “Two Faces of a Changing Steel Industry,” Financial Times, October 3, 1997, p. 13.

Williams, Scott, “LTV Nears ’Milestone’Sales Deal,” Dallas Business Journal, January 17, 1992, pp. 1, 21.

—updated by David E. Salamie