VAR?HAMIHIRA

(fl. near Ujjain, India, sixth century)

astronomy, astrology.

The best-known and most respected astrologer of India, Var?hamihira was the son and pupil of ?dityad?sa, a Maga Br?hmana and descendant of Iranian Zoroastrians who immigrated to northern India in the centuries about the beginning of the Christian era and who, while retaining some traces of the solar worship of their forebears, were absorbed into Hinduism. Var?hamihira himself stated that he was a native of Avant? or Western M?lwä (the region about Ujjain) and that he resided in the village K?pitthaka, which is probably to be identified with the ruins at Kayatha about twelve miles from Ujjain. His date is established by his own adaptation in the Pañcadiddh?ntik? of L?ta’s epoch, 505, and by the references to him as an authority in the Br?hmasphutasiddh?nta composed by Brahmagupta in 628. It has further been suggested that he was connected with the Aulikara court at Da?apura (Mandasor), and in particular with Ya?odharman, who was reigning in 532.

His numerous writings covered all of the traditional fields of astrology and astronomy in India, generally in pairs. It is evident from internal crossreferences that he composed the Pañcasiddhäntikä and Brhatsamhit? simultaneously toward the beginning of his career, although some additions were made to the latter after his other major works were completed. The Brhajjätaka was probably composed toward the end of his life, and the other treatises fall somewhere in between.

Var?hamihira was not original in his writings. In genethlialogy he depended primarily on Sphujidhvaja’s and Satya’s expositions of an Indianized Greek system, in divination on the Indian adaptations by Garga and others of Mesopotamian omen-series, and in astronomy on representatives of three traditions : the Mesopotamian-influenced ved?ñga-astronomy as represented in the first century Pait?mahasiddh?nta, the Indian versions of Greco-Babylonian solar, lunar, and planetary theory in the Vasisthasiddh?nta and Pauli?asiddh?nta, and the essentially Hellenistic astronomy of the Romakasiddh?nta and Läta’s Süryasiddh?nta. Since we have very few other sources for studying these traditions in India in the period before 500, Var?hamihira’s work is extremely valuable; and as we know little else about the Greek traditions that the sources of the Pañcasiddhäntik? depend on, it affords us a most useful if somewhat problematic insight into pre-Ptolemaic Greek astronomy.

Var?hamihira’s works are as follows:

1. The Pañcasiddh?tik?, edited with translation and commentary by O. Neugebauer and D. Pingree, 2 pts. (Copenhagen, 1970–1971). This difficult text deals with solar, lunar, and planetary theory; problems of time and terrestrial latitude: eclipses: astronomical instruments: and cosmology. Something has been said of its sources and its importance above.

2. The Brhatsambit? on divination, edited with the commentary of Utpala (966) by Sudh?kare Dvivedin, 2 vols. (Benares, 1895–1897; repr., Benares, 1968); there are several English translations, of which the best is H. Kern, “The Brhat-Sañhit?,” in Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1870), 430–479; (1871), 45–90, 231–288; (1873), 36–91, 279–338; and (1875), 81–134; this was reprinted in H. Kern, Vespreide Geschriften, 16 vols. (The Hague, 1913–1929), I 169–319, and II , 1–154. This extensive treatise, besides being one of the most complete extant Sanskrit treatises on divination, is very valuable for the information it contains about Indian geography and society: see, for instance, J. F. Fleet, “The Topographical List of the Brihat-Sanhita,” in Indian Antiquary, 22 (1893), 169–195; and A. M. Shastri, India as Seen in the Brhatsamhit? of Var?hamihira (Delhi-Patna-Varanasi, 1969).

3. The Sam?sasamhit?, Var?hamihira’s shorter work on divination. This is now lost, but many of the quotations from it can be found in A. M. Shastri, “Contribution Towards the Reconstruction of the Sam?sa-Samhit? of Var?hamihira,” in Bh?rat?ya Vidy?, 23 (1963), 22–39.

4. The Vatakanik?, a third work on divination, is also lost save for some quoted verses; see P. V. Kane, “The Vatakanik? of Var?hamihira,” in Vishveshvaranand Indological Journal, 1 (1963), 63–65.

5. The Brhajj?taka, Var?hamihira’s major work on genethlialogy; it has often been commented on and often translated. The most useful commentary is that of Utpala (966), published, for example, at Bombay in 1864. This is still the standard work on natal horoscopy in India. For its relation to Greek astrology, see The Yavanaj?taka of Sphujidvaja, D. Pingree, ed., which is to appear in the Harvard Oriental Series.

6. The Laghuj?taka is the shorter treatise on genethlialogy. It also was commented on by Utpala, and it was translated into Arabic by al-B?rün?, who inserted it into his India. There are many editions: for example, with the Hind? ortik? of K???r?ma (Bombay, 1936). Unfortunately, there exists no critical edition of either of these popular textbooks on genethlialogy.

7. The Brhady?tr? is a major treatise on military astrology. An edition of it with the surviving fragment of Utpala’s commentary, prepared by D. Pingree, is in Bulletin of the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library, Madras, 20 (1972), 1, app., 1–92; 2, app., i-xiv; and 93–130; repr. (Madras, 1972).

8. The Yogay?tr? is a shorter text on military astrology. The first nine chapters were published by H. Kern, “Die Yogay?tr? des Var?hamihira,” in Indische Studien, 10 (1868), 161–212; 14 (1876), 312–358; and 15 (1878), 167–184; and the whole, in imperfect fashion, by J. Lal (Lahore, 1944). A critical edition of the text with the commentary of Utpala has been prepared by D. Pingree.

9. The Tikanik?y?tr? is a third treatise on military astrology. It was edited by V. R. Pandit, “Tikanik?y?tr? of Var?hamihira,” in Journal of the University of Bombay, 20 (Arts, No. 26) (1951), 40–63.

10. The Viv?hapatala, a text on astrology as related to marriage, is preserved in a unique manuscript at Baroda. An edition has been prepared by V. R. Pandit.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Additional bibliographical references to those given above will be found in O. Neugebauer and D. Pingree, Pañcasiddh?ntik?, II, pp. 152–154; A. M. Shastri, India as Seen in the Brhatsamhit? pp. 504–515; and D. Pingree, Census of the Exact Sciences in Sanskrit, series A, V. (forthcoming).

David Pingree