Ibn Jan??, Jonah
IBN JAN??, JONAH
IBN JAN??, JONAH (Abu al-Walid Marwan; first half of 11thcentury), Spanish Hebrew grammarian and Hebrew lexicographer. In his writings Ibn Jan?? refers to himself in various ways: by his full name (Luma?, 19), by Abu al-Walid (ibid., 169, 284), by Marwan (Derenbourg (1880), lixff.), and by Ibn Jan?h (Luma?, 21). Similarly, contemporary Arabic-writing authors (e.g., *Samuel ha-Nagid, *Ba?ya ibn Paquda, Moses *Ibn Ezra) referred to him by these several names. In Hebrew works he is called R. Jonah or R. Marinus, these names, given to him by Abraham *Ibn Ezra (Devir, 2 (1920), 277; see M. Wilensky, Le nom d'Abou-l-Walîd (1932), 55–58), being the Hebrew forms of his surname (Ibn Jan?? = "the winged," and hence Jonah = "a dove") and personal name (Marwan = Marinus).
His Life
Information about his life is extremely scant. Even his birthplace, his birth and death dates, and his father's name, are not known with certainty. He may have been born in Cordoba or in neighboring Lucena (Wilensky, in Tarbiz, 4 (1932/33), 97–99). However, it is known that he was educated at Lucena and studied, according to his own statement, under R. Isaac b. Levi *ibn Mar Saul and R. Isaac ibn *Gikatilla. The former was, in his pupil's words, "one of the greatest philologists" (Derenbourg (1880), 333), whose poems Ibn Jan?? read aloud to him, discussing their language with him as well as the meaning of various biblical words. Isaac ibn Gikatilla encouraged him to devote himself to the study of Arabic language and literature. Among other scholars of Lucena mentioned by Ibn Jan?h are Abu al-Walid ibn ?asdai (Luma?, 152; Derenbourg (1880), 317) and Abu Omar ibn Yaq?y (U??l, s.v. ?-?-?) who were likewise interested in grammar. Thus already in his youth Ibn Jan?? devoted himself to philology, biblical exegesis, the language of the Mishnah, the Aramaic of the Targumim and the Talmud, as well as Arabic language and literature. He even tried his hand at writing poetry, but this he later abandoned (Luma?, 305). In his youth he settled in (or returned to) Cordoba, where he lived until the persecutions of 1012. There he made a study of the grammatical works of Judah b. David *?ayyuj, with whom apparently he was not personally acquainted, either because Ibn Jan?h was still a child at the time of, or came to Cordoba after, ?ayyuj's death. Nor did he know Samuel ha-Nagid, with whom he later became involved in a written controversy on philological subjects. In Cordoba he studied medicine, which provided him with a livelihood throughout his life. The Arab historian Ibn Abi U?aybi?a, in his biography of physicians (ed. August Mueller, 2 (1884), 50), mentions that Ibn Jan?? was interested in logic and had an extensive knowledge of Arabic and Hebrew philology, and ascribes to him a no longer extant book on medicine, Kit?b al-Talkh?? ("The Book of Commentary"). Ibn Jan?? left Cordoba when it was besieged by the Berbers (1012), and settled, after much wandering (Derenbourg (1880), 3), in Saragossa where he lived until his death. There, forming a circle of young scholars interested in linguistic questions, he wrote his philological works which, like his activities, aroused the opposition of some local talmudic scholars (Sefer ha-Rikmah, ed. M. Wilensky, 1 (19642), 11).
His Works
(1) Kit?b al-Mustal?aq (Heb., Sefer ha-Hassagah, "The Book of Criticism"), based entirely on ?ayyuj's system of the triliteral root, criticizes his grammatical writings, dealing first with the weak, the geminative, and finally the quadriliteral verbs. Assessing and supplementing ?ayyuj's statements under almost every root, Ibn Jan??, according to his own evidence (Derenbourg (1880), 245) deals with more than 50 roots not mentioned by ?ayyuj, with some 50 meanings of roots which he overlooked, and with more than 100 verbal forms (conjugations, tenses), in addition to including about 50 interpretations and some 40 theoretical philological topics. He began writing the book in Cordoba, but because of the necessity to flee and his subsequent wanderings, completed it only after settling in Saragossa.
(2) Ris?lat al-Tanb?h (translated by Judah ibn Tibbon as Sefer (instead of Iggeret, "The Epistle") ha-He'arah, "The Book of Admonition") is a reply to a work which, written in Saragossa under the title of Kit?b al-Ist?f?? ("The Book of Detailed Occupation," and known as Sefer ha-Hashlamah, "The Book of Supplement"), criticized Ibn Jan??'s Sefer ha-Hassagah and his failure to include yet further criticism of ?ayyuj's writings. He refuted its arguments by replying to them in the form of a letter to a friend in Saragossa.
(3) In Kit?b (sometimes: Ris?lat) al-taqr?b wa al-Tash?l (Iggeret ha-Keruv ve-ha-Yishur, "The Epistle of Bringing Near and Making Easy"), a work intended for beginners, Ibn Jan?? sets out to explain some difficult passages in the introductions to ?ayyuj's writings. But he ranges beyond this framework and deals with fundamental grammatical subjects from his own point of view.
(4) Kit?b al-Taswiya ("The Book of Rebuke"; called Sefer ha-Tokha?at or Sefer ha-Hashva'ah by Judah ibn Tibbon) is Ibn Jan??'s reply to the criticism which Samuel ha-Nagid and his friends leveled against his Sefer ha-Hassagah. He learned of these criticisms from one of Samuel's friends who was on a visit to Saragossa. After first enumerating the criticisms conveyed at that meeting, Ibn Jan?h sets forth his refutation.
(5) Kit?b al-Tashw?r (Sefer ha-Hakhlamah, "The Book of Shaming") which Ibn Jan?? often mentioned with pride is an answer to Samuel ha-Naggid's criticism contained in the latter's Ras??il al-Rif?q ("The Epistles of the Companions").
(6) Of paramount importance is Ibn Jan??'s last work, Kit?b al-Tanq?? ("The Book of Minute Research") which Judah ibn Tibbon translated as Sefer ha-Dikduk. It is the first complete book on Hebrew philology to be preserved in its entirety. In range and theoretical basis no other work of Hebrew grammar can be compared to it. The work consists of two parts: the first, a grammar, entitled Kit?b al-Luma? ("The Book of Variegated Flower-Beds"); and the second, a complete dictionary of biblical Hebrew, called Kit?b al-U??l (translated by Judah ibn Tibbon as Sefer ha-Rikmah and Sefer ha-Shorashim respectively). The work as a whole is prefaced by an introduction, and an additional introduction prefaces Kit?bal-U??l. Sefer ha-Rikmah consists of 45 (46) chapters. The first chapter is a general survey of the parts of speech. Chapters 2–6 (7) treat the consonants, their accentuation, their function in a word as radicals or affixes, and their metathesis. Chapter 7 (8) deals with the transposition of vowels; 8 (9) apposition; 9 (10)–13 (14) etymology, and the formation and inflection of words; chapter 14 (15) vowel changes due to the gutturals; 15 (16) the function of the verb; 16 (17) pronouns; 17 (18) the copulative "vav"; 18 (19) the construct state; 19 (20) conjunctive and disjunctive forms; 20 (21) relative forms; 21 (22) elision; 22 (23) prevention of elision; 23 (24) the plural and the dual; 24 (25)–33 (34) linguistic irregularities: ellipsis, pleonasm, repetition, hapax legomena, inverted order, etc.; 34 (35)–35 (36) interrogation and vocalization of the interrogative he; 36 (37) the definite and indefinite articles; 37 (38)–42 (43) gender; and finally 43 (44)–45 (46) number. Sefer ha-Shorashim, a complete dictionary of biblical Hebrew, includes not only the words derived from roots but the pronouns and particles, as well as the names of weights and measures, birds and stones, but not, as a rule, personal or place names. The operative unit of the dictionary is the root, whose letters Ibn Jan?? designates by their Arabic names, as for example, al-alif, al-b??, al-l?m (= ?-?-?). The entire work, which also contains exegetical excursuses on difficult biblical passages, is divided into 22 sections arranged alphabetically according to the first root letter, while within each section the roots are arranged according to the alphabetical order of the second and third root letters, the exception being those with a duplicated letter which come at the beginning, e.g., ?? before ??? ,??? before ???, and so on. Each article has the different forms derived from the same root as also their Arabic translation, the affinity between which and the Hebrew word Ibn Jan?? sometimes discusses. For an elucidation of grammatical questions he refers the reader to Sefer ha-Rikmah, to his other works, and to those of ?ayyuj.
Manuscripts, Printed Editions, and Hebrew Versions
Ibn Jan??'s works, with the exception of Kit?b al-Tashw?r (5), are extant in their original form in their entirety or almost so. Of Kit?b al-Tashw?r only a small fragment, comprising the end of the introduction and the beginning of the work itself, has been discovered. At present contained in the Firkovich collection in Leningrad, it was published by Derenbourg (1880, xlix–liii). Works 1–4 have been preserved together with those of ?ayyuj in a manuscript completed in Cairo in 1316 by the copyist Joseph b. Solomon and now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford (Neubauer, 1453). This manuscript, which has the works in the order of 3, 1, 2, 4, was published by Derenbourg (1880) in the sequence given by Ibn Jan?? in the introduction to his grammatical work (Luma?, 16 = Rikmah, 27) and adopted in this article. In publishing Kit?b al-Taswiya (4) Derenbourg also used a manuscript from the Firkovich collection. According to Kokowzoff (1911, 1228), the second Firkovich collection has numerous fragments of these works belonging to eight or nine independent manuscripts, some of which are extremely early, one dating from 1119, another from 1126, and still another from 1144. Kit?b al-Mustalhaq (1), as published by Derenbourg, is deficient in the two articles ?-?-? and ?-?-? which are, however, contained in some of the Leningrad manuscripts (idem, 1229–132). Four of the five works have been translated into Hebrew. Kit?b al-Mustal?aq (1) was translated by Obadiah (12th century?) under the title of Sefer ha-Hassagah, published by D. Tenné (2005) on the basis of two extant manuscripts: one, known as the Epstein manuscript and which Isaac b. Yosht completed copying in 1225, was in the Library of the Vienna Community (Schwarz, 1931, 68) until the Holocaust and is now in the Yehuda collection of the National and University Library, Jerusalem. The second manuscript is in Rome, Casanatensa library (Kokowzoff, 3132 = Sacerdote, 209) and a copy of it is in the Bodleian Library, Oxford (Neubauer, 2509). Ris?lat al-Tanb?h (2) and Kit?b al-Tashw?r (5) were translated in 1254 at Béziers by Joseph b. Job, and Kit?b al-Taqr?b wa al-Tash?l (3) by Jacob b. Isaac *Roman (first half of the 17th century), but neither translation is extant. Kit?b al-Tanq?? (6) has been preserved in its entirety in both its Arabic original and Hebrew translation. Two manuscripts of Kit?b al-Luma?, which together compose four-fifths of the work, are in the Bodleian Library, Oxford (Neubauer, 1459, 1462), and on their basis Derenbourg (1886), with the active participation of Bacher, published the work. An incomplete third manuscript in the British Museum (Ms. Or. 2595) was used by Derenbourg (1886) to supply the missing part of the two manuscripts, but not to determine the passages common to all three. Derenbourg also used a fragmentary manuscript of 1161/62 from the second Firkovich collection. In any case, the bulk of Derenbourg's edition (pp. 72–204, 292–349) is based on only one manuscript. The existence of four or five manuscripts of Kit?b al-Luma?, some complete and very early, is mentioned by Kokowzoff (1911, 1235). Neubauer (1875) published Kit?b al-U??l on the basis of a unique, complete manuscript (Neubauer, 1461) dated 1421 and two incomplete manuscripts, the Rouen manuscript and the Oxford manuscript (idem, 1462). W. *Bacher (1894) found an additional fragment in the Rainer collection, Vienna, while the existence of six or seven additional manuscripts, some complete, in the second Firkovich collection in Leningrad was reported by Kokowzoff (1911, 1235). In the meantime yet another manuscript was found in the British Museum, Ms. Or. 4837 (= Margoliouth, 953). The printed versions of Ibn Jan?h's works are far from satisfactory, and hence the need for a scholarly edition of his complete writings based on all the known manuscripts. The two parts of Kit?b al-Tanq?? (6) were translated into Hebrew by Judah ibn Tibbon who finished the translation of Kit?b al-U??l in 1171. (On other attempts at translation, see Bacher, 1894, xxxv–xxxvi.) The first of Ibn Jan??'s works to appear in print, Sefer ha-Rikmah, has been published twice; first by Goldberg-Kirchheim in 1856. This edition, which is faulty and not to be recommended, is based on two Paris manuscripts (Zotenberg, 1216, of the 13thand 1217 of the 14th centuries respectively). It was published a second time by Wilensky (1929–1931) on the basis of the same two manuscripts as well as two additional ones, the Escorial manuscript (complete) and the Oxford manuscript (Neubauer, 2510), and issued in a second edition by Tenné (1964). Sefer ha-Shorashim was published by Bacher (1894, 19682) on the basis of a complete manuscript in the Vatican (Cod. Urbin. 54) and a fragmentary one in the Escorial.
Sources
Ibn Jan?h complained that in his day there were no reliable texts in Spain (Luma?, 238, 323 = Rikmah, 253, 338), and hence he based his readings on codices of the Bible, having, according to his own testimony, used the Jerusalem (Ere? Israel) and the Babylonian codices (Luma?, 238 = Rikmah, 253; Derenbourg, 1880, 106), as well as a Damascus codex (Luma?, 242 = Rikmah, 257). In some passages he also mentions unspecified codices of the Bible. He had a particularly high regard for a Jerusalem codex (Luma?, 238, 323 = Rikmah, 253, 338) brought to Spain by Mar Jacob, a pilgrim from Leon. Ibn Jan?? adhered strictly to the masoretic text, which he frequently mentions. He used the variant readings of the ketiv and the keri, the terms ????? and ???? as employed in the masoretic literature, and the differences between *Ben-Asher and *Ben-Naphtali. The masoretic works he refers to are Okhlah ve-Okhlah, Sefer ha-Kolot (Kit?b al-Mu?awwit?t), and Dikdukei ha-Te'amim. Ibn Jan?? made extensive use not only of the Targumim on the Bible, Targum Onkelos on the Pentateuch and the Targum on the Prophets, but also of the language of the Talmud. In Sefer ha-Shorashim he compares the mishnaic and the biblical language 257 times and frequently mentions the Tosefta. In Sefer ha-Rikmah he refers 67 times to the Babylonian Talmud and twice to the Jerusalem Talmud. While not mentioning the halakhic Midrashim by name, he quotes numerous statements from the Sifra, two from the Sifrei, and one from the Mekhilta. Under the name of Bereshit de R. *Hoshaiah, Ibn Jan?? quotes from Genesis Rabbah, refers once to Sefer Ye?irah, and mentions prayers, piyyutim, and a Palestinian paytan, *Yose b. Yose. In quoting geonic literature he refers to *Yehudai, *Saadiah, *?efez b. Ya?li'ah Resh Kallah, *Sherira, *Samuel b. Hophni, and *Hai. In particular he used Saadiah's Tafs?r and Sharh without however mentioning them explicitly. Of contemporaneous poets he refers to *Menahem b. Jacob ibn Saruq, *Dunash b. Labrat, Isaac ibn Mar Saul, Judah b. ?aniga (?), and Isaac *ibn Khalfun. Ibn Jan?? makes but scant mention of the grammarians before ?ayyuj. Although he refers to Saadiah's Kutub al-Lugha, he states that he did not use it (Rikmah, 39, 193), the work having apparently not reached Spain. He also mentions Saadiah's Pitron Shivim Millot as well as philological topics from the latter's commentary on Sefer Ye?irah. Of the other grammarians who preceded him, Ibn Jan?? mentions incidentally Judah *ibn Quraysh, Menahem b. Saruq, and Dunash b. Labrat. By contrast he cites hundreds of times ?ayyuj and his works, to which his indebtedness was so considerable that he refers the reader to them, even advising the latter to study them before turning to his own great work.
His Influence
In the shaping of Hebrew philology, ibn Jan??'s influence has no parallel in extent, depth, and persistence. In the 11th century he was already mentioned and/or quoted by Isaac *ibn Yashush, Moses b. Samuel Ha-Kohen *Gikatilla, Judah *ibn Bal'am, and Bahya ibn Paquda, in addition to Samuel ha-Nagid with whom he became involved in a controversy. The 12th-century authors who mention and/or quote him are very numerous, among them being Abu Ibrahim Isaac *ibn Barun, Moses ibn Ezra, the Karaite *Jacob b. Reuben, Abraham *ibn Ezra, Abraham ha-Levi *ibn Daud, Samuel ibn *Jama, Joseph ha-Konstantini, Nathanel, the Karaite Judah (Ha-Avel) b. Elijah *Hadassi, Solomon b. Abraham *Par?on, Joseph *Kim?i, *Zerahiah b. Isaac ha-Levi Gerondi, Judah ibn Tibbon, *Maimonides, Menahem b. Simeon of Posquières, and Moses b. Sheshet. Ibn Jan?? was likewise mentioned or quoted by authors of the 13th century onward, some of whom knew his writings in the original, others in the Hebrew translation. Thus from the 12th century all or some of his works were known not only to philologists, and those writers who had recourse to philology, but also to exegetes, both Rabbanite and Karaite, whether they wrote in Arabic or Hebrew. The exception to this dependency were commentators of the school of *Rashi who were unacquainted with the works of both ?ayyuj and Ibn Jan??. The works of the Samaritan grammarian Abu Is??q Ibr?h?m b. Faraj b. M?r?th contain statements which are identical to those of Ibn Jan??, whom he does not, however, mention by name (see Ben-?ayyim (1957), 640, S.V. Jonah ibn Jan?h). The philological works written in the 12th and 13th centuries, such as those of Abraham Ibn Ezra and David *Kim?i, may with every justification be said to be popular editions or popularizations of Ibn Jan?h's philology, particularly its practical aspect.
His Personality
From Ibn Jan??'s writings there emerges the image of a scholar who made the quest for truth the sacred duty of his life. According to his own testimony, he read the Bible eight times when preparing his great work, and expended on oil for light what others did on wine. His devotion to truth can be epitomized in the dictum which he quoted: "Truth and Plato strove. Both of them are friends of ours, but truth is closer to us."
bibliography:
M. Wilensky (ed.), Ibn Jan??, Sefer ha-Rikmah, 2 vols. (1969); idem, Le nom d'Aboû-l-Walid (1932); D. Tenne, in: Sefer ha-Rikmah, 2 (1969), 691–710; J. and H. Derenbourg, Opuscules et traités d'Abou-l-Walid ibn Merwan ibn Djanah de Cordoue (1880); J. Derenbourg (ed.), Ibn Jannah, Le Livre des parterres fleuris,… (1886); W. Bacher, Leben und Werke des Abulwalid Merwan ibn Ganach (R. Judah) und die Quellen seiner Schrifterklaerung (1885); A. Neubauer (ed.), The Book of the Hebrew Roots (1875, repr. 1968). add. bibliography: I. Eldar, "Le-Toledot ha-Mahloket ha-Dikdukit bein Ibn Janah li-Shemuel ha-Nagid, be-Ikvot Gilluyo shel Keta Genizah mi-Sefer ha-Hakhlamah le-Ibn Janah," in: Mehkarim ba-Lashon ha-Ivrit u-vi-Leshonot ha-Yehudim Muggashim li-Shelomo Morag (1996), 41–61; D. Becker, Mekorot Arviyyim le-Dikduko shel Rabbi Yonah ibn Janah (1998); A. Maman, Comparative Semitic Philology in the Middle Ages from Sa'adiah Gaon to Ibn Barun (10th-12thcent.) (2004).
[David Tenne]