Ybarra v. Illinois 444 U.S. 85 (1979)

views updated

YBARRA v. ILLINOIS 444 U.S. 85 (1979)

Although three dissenting Justices complained that the Supreme Court majority had narrowed the stop-and-frisk rule of terry v. ohio (1968), Justice potter stewart for the Court did not doubt that an officer may pat down a suspect for a concealed weapon. Stewart regarded Terry as an exception to the requirement of probable cause. Here no such cause existed to search a person suspected neither of criminal activity nor of having a weapon. A police officer, having a warrant to search a tavern and its bartender, patted down a bystander, felt no weapon, but removed from his pocket a cigarette pack containing heroin. The Court reversed the man's conviction, because the warrant did not include him, and probable cause to search him was absent.

Leonard W. Levy
(1986)

More From encyclopedia.com