Theravada
THERAV?DA
Therav?da is the dominant form of Buddhism in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar (Burma), Sri Lanka, and Thailand. It remains a central component of the Buddhism of Vietnam, even after its formal unification with Mahayana forms in the 1960s. The tradition is followed by the Baruas, Chakma, and Magh ethnic groups in Bangladesh, and the Shans of southern China. Historically, the Theravada school was also important in South India, and had a wider presence in South and Southeast Asia more generally, including Indonesia. In the modern period, Therav?da has spread worldwide through diaspora and mission. The school has been instrumental in the Buddhist revival in India and has begun to replace traditional Newari Buddhism in the Kathmandu valley of Nepal. Missionary monks worldwide serve both diasporic and convert Buddhists, often as separate congregations. In the two relatively recent phenomena of Western convert and engaged Buddhism, Therav?da is likely to be universalized rather than culturally specific, and to be mixed or at least in dialogue with other forms of Buddhism and even other religions. There are an estimated 100 million Theravada Buddhists worldwide.
Scriptural authority
Among the key features of traditional Ther?vada Buddhism are the use of P?li as a sacred language and the acceptance of the P?li Buddhist canon (tipi?aka) as the highest scriptural authority. This remains true nominally even where the tipi?aka is not directly relevant to belief or practice, and in spite of so-called apocrypha and numerous other religious texts that teach noncanonical practices.
Therav?da's doctrinal tradition derives from the distinctive Abhidhamma Pi?aka of its aforementioned tipi?aka. Because of the form of analytical doctrine (P?li, vibhajjav?da) represented in this abhidhamma (Sanskrit, abhidharma) section of its canon, some scholars have suggested that Therav?da is better identified as the Vibhajjav?da school.
Therav?da is also characterized by an ordination tradition based on its distinctive VinayaPi?aka. Although various branches of Therav?da may historically have used other vinayas, modern variations within the school relate principally to differing interpretations of the traditional 227 rules of conduct for monks outlined in the P?li vinaya. Thus there are different nik?yas (ordination lineages) within Therav?da, and numerous sub-nik?yas.
Commentarial tradition and historiography
The scriptural authority of the P?li tipi?aka continues through strata of commentaries and compendia, dominated by works attributed to the fifth-century Indian scholar-monk Buddhaghosa. Buddhaghosa is often considered to be the authoritative arbiter of Therav?da orthodoxy, although this status has been challenged, for example, by proponents of Burmese-style vipassan? (Sanskrit, vipa?yan?) meditation in Sri Lanka in the twentieth century.
One explanation for Buddhaghosa's dominance over Therav?da scholasticism lies in the use made of him by another key figure in the commentarial tradition, the twelfth-century scholar-monk S?riputta. S?riputta emerged as the premier scholastic figure in Therav?da following King Parakramabahu I's unification of the central Sri Lankan sa?gha groups under the Mah?vih?ra monastic tradition. S?riputta based much of his interpretation of vinaya and doctrine on Buddhaghosa. Because of the political dominance of Sri Lanka at the time and the Mah?vih?ra tradition's reputation as the representative of Therav?da orthodoxy and orthopraxy, many monks on mainland Southeast Asia sought ordination in the Mah?vih?ra lineage. Mah?vih?ra-derived lineages subsequently gained political support in mainland Southeast Asia, and S?riputta's influence shaped literary developments within Therav?da over subsequent centuries.
The legacy of Mah?vih?ra dominance has had an enormous impact on our understanding of the history of Therav?da more generally. Therav?da's own historiography is preserved mainly within the va?sa (chronicle) tradition of the Mah?vih?ra and traditions derived from it. These chronicles emphasize the significance of the Mah?vih?ra, Sri Lanka, and P?li orthodoxy, and appear to have obscured local traditions.
According to the commentarial and va?sa tradition, Therav?da is original Buddhism. Like the sutta (Sanskrit, s?tra) and vinaya texts of its tipi?aka, its abhidhamma texts too are attributed directly to the Buddha, who is said to have taught them to his mother in heaven, where they were witnessed for posterity by the Buddha's disciple S?riputta (Sanskrit, ??riputra). Therav?da even claims that its commentaries were compiled at the First Council following the Buddha's death. All the texts in its canon were rehearsed again at a second council one hundred years later. While the term Therav?da, meaning "doctrine of the elders," could be understood to indicate Buddhism in contrast to other religious traditions, the term becomes associated with a specific school in the Therav?da account of the schism between the Mah?s??ghika school and more orthodox Sthaviras (the Sanskrit equivalent of the P?li term Thera) that is said to have occasioned the Second Council. Therav?da sees itself as the continuation of this orthodox Sthavira branch of the early Buddhist tradition. The ambiguity of the term theriya, which can mean either "elder Buddhist monk" or "follower of the Thera school," complicates attempts to trace the school's early history. According to Therav?da tradition, its orthodoxy was again defended under Emperor A?oka in the third century b.c.e., this time against the corruption of heretics, which set a precedent for state intervention in the affairs of the sa?gha, which has shaped so much of the subsequent history of Therav?da.
After this purification, A?oka had his son Mahinda and daughter Sa?ghamitta ordained. They are credited with bringing Therav?da and its orthodox canon and commentaries to Sri Lanka, the same commentaries that Buddhaghosa later redacted back into the original P?li from Singhalese. The va?sas also record that two monks, Sona and Uttara, took Therav?da to mainland Southeast Asia around this time. Trade links had certainly already been forged between the Indian mainland, Sri Lanka, and mainland Southeast Asia by the third century b.c.e., although archaeological evidence suggests that the introduction of Buddhism into these new regions occurred in piecemeal and diverse fashions.
Sometimes it is hard to relate inscriptions and other archaeological finds to a specific school and the association of P?li exclusively with Therav?da may prove anachronistic. Therav?da seems to have flourished in parts of Burma and Thailand from the fourth century onward, becoming particularly strong in the lower Burmese kingdom of Pyu and the Dv?ravat? polity of Thailand. While Therav?da on the whole seems to have coexisted in mainland Southeast Asia with other traditions of Buddhism, as it had to a lesser extent in Sri Lanka, it sometimes became almost a quasi-state religion. This happened, for example, under King Aniruddha of the Pagan kingdom of upper Burma in the eleventh century, under King Ramkhamhaeng of central Thailand in the thirteenth century, and under King Tilokar?t of northern Thailand in the fifteenth century.
Buddhology
The buddhology of Therav?da is dominated by the figure of Gotama (Sanskrit, Gautama) Buddha, the historical Buddha, who lived in the sixth century b.c.e. according to Therav?da chronology. Also important are the other four buddhas of the current world age, in particular the future buddha Metteyya (Sanskrit, Maitreya). There is formally a tradition of twenty-four previous buddhas recorded in the Buddhavamsa (Chronicle of the Buddhas) text of the Sutta Pi?aka, but they rarely figure in iconography or narrative, except in relation to the career of Gotama Buddha in his former lives. Other important cultic figures include localized Indic and Buddhicized local deities, as well as heroic and mythic figures. N?gas, mythical serpent beings that can take human form, are frequently represented as protectors of Buddhism. The process of localization, whereby divinities and spirits local to the host culture of Buddhism are adopted as protectors of Buddhism, has been important in Buddhism's adaptation to new cultures. As Therav?da ousted other forms of Buddhism in mainland Southeast Asia, it has incorporated figures such as Upagupta, Gav??pati, and Pi??ola Bh?radv?ja, who are thought to have been more important originally in other Buddhist schools, such as the Sarv?stiv?da. Consequently, the identity and significance of various deities and protective and other cultic figures varies greatly between different areas, and even between individual villages. They often serve some of the this-worldly functions of Therav?da religion.
Sacred landscape
The sacred landscape of Therav?da is dominated by monastic complexes. These complexes typically incorporate monastic dwellings, a building or area for sermons, a st?pa in commemoration of the historical Buddha, a bodhi tree, a Buddha image, often in an enclosed temple, along with other traditional representations of the Buddha, such as his sacred footprint. In many villages the local temple is the dominant feature. Temples are often decorated with carvings outside and, inside, with paintings of episodes in Gotama Buddha's former lives (j?taka) or final life, images of hells, and legends relating the coming of Buddhism to the region. Deities may also be featured in a subordinate position in the temple layout or contributory landscape. It is often believed that a guardian deity resides within the st?pa, tree, or image, in addition to the inherent Buddha power. St?pas are often believed to contain relics of Gotama Buddha. Shrines, images, and st?pas are also found independent of the monastic complex. Other features of the sacred landscape are forest and mountain hermitage sites for meditation monks, and, since the 1950s, meditation and retreat centers for laypeople.
The three refuges in religious practice and the role of ordination
Much Therav?da practice revolves around the three refuges of the Buddha, dhamma (Sanskrit, dharma), and sa?gha. Appropriate treatment of all three is a key focus of merit and meritmaking, a principal focus of religious practice in Theravada.
Worship of the Buddha varies from daily and incidental personal worship to annual festivals involving the entire community. The annual festival of Wesak, named after the lunar month in which it takes place (April/May), celebrates the Buddha's birth, enlightenment and death. Celebrations of other events, such as his former births, in particular the very popular Vessantara-j?taka, may also form a significant component of festivals that are not primarily Buddhist in focus, such as annual harvest festivals or ancestor rites. Occasional ceremonies include consecrations of images and inaugurations of both sacred and secular buildings. Worship involves offerings of flowers, rice, and lamps to the Buddha image and circumambulation of the st?pa. While the Buddha in human form may have died, his powers are thought to remain accessible through his relics and images. A legend known throughout the Therav?da world states that the Buddha himself commissioned his own first image, and imbued it with all his own qualities so that it might remain to protect the dhamma. Some relics and statues are associated with the security of the nation, as is the case with the tooth relic enshrined in Kandy, Sri Lanka, or the Emerald Buddha in Thailand. Va?sas record visits the Buddha made during his lifetime to the later strongholds of Therav?da Buddhism, in which he predicts the future glory of the religion and the monarchs who protect it in the region, and sometimes leaves behind relics. The predicted continuation of the dhamma in a particular region or in association with a particular royal lineage has been used to authorize the sa?gha-state interaction that dominates Therav?da history. Pilgrimages to sites associated with Gotama or previous buddhas—both in different Therav?da countries and the area of north India in which the historical Buddha lived—continue to be a popular form of merit-making.
The monk represents the ideal of enlightenment, even if this is nowadays thought by most to be unattainable, and in some traditions the ordinand ritually reenacts the life of the Buddha at ordination. Ordination of men is mainstream. In Sri Lanka, lifelong ordination remains the dominant intention, although monks often secede from the order, sometimes after becoming established in a career, and there is an increasing tendency toward ordination as a form of retirement. In mainland Southeast Asian traditions that have not been undermined by communism, most Buddhist men will ordain at some point in their lives, even if only for a short period. In these societies, ordination fulfills the function of a coming-of-age ceremony and is also seen as a way of providing one's parents, in particular one's mother, with merit to ensure a heavenly rebirth, thus repaying her for the agony of childbirth. The earliest age for novice ordination (the lower of the two levels of ordination) varies from very young boys in Myanmar, to eight-year-olds and above in Sri Lanka, and teenagers and upward in Thailand. The availability of education through non-monastic state and private educational institutions has altered ordination patterns, as has the need to fit temporary ordination into the schedule of compulsory education. While temporary ordinations used to last for the three months of the annual rains-retreat, some are now designed to fit into the long university vacation. In communist countries, the loss of prestige and the lack of continuity in ordination traditions have reduced the dominance of ordination, especially in urban areas.
Full ordination for women died out in the medieval period and some Therav?da traditions have only recently attempted to revive it through reimportation of a Buddhist ordination lineage from East Asia (in 1996 in Sri Lanka, in 2002 in Thailand). For this reason, manifestations of female renunciation in the Theravada school are quite diverse. Many women have pursued a life of celibate renunciation by undertaking either individually or in an institutionalized group most or all of the ten precepts traditionally undertaken by a novice monk. Sometimes nunneries are attached to monasteries, and nuns may essentially serve the domestic needs of monks. Sometimes nuns have separate institutions and are independent of monks, a situation only fully possible in the absence of full ordination, since full ordination for women requires the participation of monks. The prestige and opportunities accorded Therav?da nuns have greatly increased over the past few decades. Nevertheless, it is the exception rather than the rule for nuns to form a significant focal point in the religious life of a Therav?da layperson.
By contrast, monks are the focus of lay religious practice at a whole range of ceremonies, from large annual celebrations to incidental homage paid when a layperson meets a monk. Perhaps the most significant of the annual ceremonies is the ka?hina ceremony, at which robes (ka?hina) and other gifts are offered to monks at the end of the rains-retreat.
In addition to representing and pursuing the ideal of nibb?na (Sanskrit, nirv??a), monks fulfill a number of other roles. They are the preservers and communicators of the dhamma. They are the formalized recipients of the generosity and esteem of laypeople and thereby serve as a source of merit for the laity. They act as spiritual teachers, particularly through providing sermons on holy days and on special occasions. They may act as advisers to rulers and governments. Some monks have even become members of parliament, trade union heads, and directors of charities. They have traditionally been educators, especially before the introduction of state education. Finally, monks fulfill the function of priests and ritual specialists, and sometimes even serve as astrologists. As ritual specialists monks have a role in administering the refuges and precepts to laypeople, and in performing funerals. They are often engaged to perform apotropaic rituals, which focus on the protective power of the Buddha and the dhamma.
Paritta
The most common manifestation of such protective rituals is the recitation of paritta and rak?? texts, which are considered to offer powerful protection in warding off dangers and appeasing malevolent spirits. Paritta recitation can last throughout the night or even for seven days and nights. During the ceremony further objects may be imbued with protective qualities, including string, sacred water, and amulets and talismans. In mainland Southeast Asia it is common for men to wear protective amulets in the form of small Buddha images, images of famous monks or kings, mythical figures, or even phallic shapes. Other forms of visual protection include yantras, which may be drawn on cloth or used as the pattern for a tattoo. They portray heroic figures and sacred writing of Buddhist formulae in P?li, sometimes in the form of geometric designs and outlines of the Buddha.
Attempts to classify Therav?da
Much Therav?da religious activity includes ritualized interaction with the Buddha, dhamma, and sa?gha in combination in one or more of the forms described above. As such, Therav?da has much in common with other forms of Buddhism. In scholarship it is often strongly demarcated from other traditions, although the viability of such distinctions is currently under scrutiny.
One such distinction can be summarized on the basis of the relative value in Therav?da of self-transformation through meditation and ritual. Paraphrasing the work of Melford Spiro, Therav?da religion may be said to fall into three categories. First, nibb?nic Therav?da focuses on self-transformation, chiefly through meditations aimed at developing the emotional responses and level of insight of individuals so that they become enlightened and escape from sa?s?ra. Second, kammatic religion focuses on merit-making and ethical action, to improve one's future life and lives within sa?s?ra. Third, apotropaic Buddhism uses magic in the form of amulets and rituals to deal with this-worldly concerns, either in distinction to or outside of the law of karmic cause and effect.
Tibetan Buddhism has been similarly categorized by Geoffrey Samuel. His three categories are: first, bodhi-oriented practices that focus on often ritualized altruism and higher levels of tantric ritual; second, karma-oriented merit-making to improve future life within sa?s?ra; and third, pragmatic religion for this-worldly concerns, using tantric ritual.
If we align these two analyses we see that in terms of the two categories of seeking improved life within sa?s?ra and this-worldly concerns, Therav?da and Tibetan Buddhism are directly parallel. It is at the soteriological end that Therav?da putatively eschews ritual and magic, whereas Tibetan Buddhism invokes it. However, there is a tradition of ritualized soteriology in Therav?da too that was found throughout the Therav?da world in the premodern period. This tradition involved ritual identification with the Buddha and the assimilation of the Buddha's qualities, much as are found in Tibetan tantra, yet using only Therav?da categories and nomenclature. Thus, Therav?da also employs ritual practices that might be designated magical at the nibb?nic/bodhi end of the spectrum, a convergence that minimizes the distinction between Tibetan and Therav?da Buddhist practices. It further suggests that the apparent Therav?da focus on forms of meditation found in the tipi?aka and Buddhaghosa may be the result of a narrowing of the tradition caused in part by the close state-sa?gha relationship that shaped dominant forms of Therav?da.
A more widespread generalization often made regarding Therav?da is that it is the sole surviving form of H?nay?na Buddhism. The supposed Mah?y?na-H?nay?na dichotomy is so prevalent in Buddhist literature that it has yet fully to loosen its hold over scholarly representations of the religion. H?nay?na (literally, "inferior way") is a polemical term, which self-described Mah?y?na (literally, "great way") Buddhist literature uses to denigrate its opponents. As such, H?nay?na is a designation that has no clearly identifiable external referent. Some of the first attempts to categorize forms of Buddhism as either H?nay?na or Mah?y?na are found in the accounts of early Chinese pilgrims to South Asia. But there are additional reasons for the modern association of Therav?da with H?nay?na. The first is that one body of Mah?y?na texts, the PrajÑ?p?ramit? literature, propounds the lack of self of all dharmas, a critique of the analytical categories of the abhidharma. This position is refuted in the Kath?vatthu (Points of Controversy), a text of the Therav?da Abhidhamma Pi?aka, which purports to discuss points of debate with other religious traditions raised at the Third Council. The second is that one supposed characteristic of the Mah?y?na involves the proliferation of multiple buddhas in parallel world systems. The possibility of more than one buddha living at a time is a view also rejected in the Kath?vatthu. The most common reason made to distinguish Mah?y?na and Therav?da is thoroughly flawed. This is the distinction made between Mah?y?na as the path of the bodhisattva and Therav?da as the path of the arhat or ?ravaka (disciple). Even Buddhaghosa recognized three levels of practice: that of the Buddha through the path of the bodhisatta (Sanskrit, bodhisattva); that of the paccekabuddha (Sanskrit, pratyekabuddha); and that of the arhat. Furthermore the bodhisattva ideal is present throughout Therav?da history, even if it never became ritualized and institutionalized to the same degree as it did in other Buddhist traditions. Although the bodhisattva ideal in Therav?da is more commonly associated with Gotama Buddha himself and with kings, it is also found expressed by those of humbler position. It is, for example, a common vow made by manuscript copyists in the colophons to Therav?da texts.
See also:Cambodia; Commentarial Literature; Councils, Buddhist; Folk Religion, Southeast Asia; Laos; Mainstream Buddhist Schools; Myanmar; P?li, Buddhist Literature in; Sri Lanka; Thailand; Therav?da Art and Architecture; Vietnam
Bibliography
Assavavirulhakarn, Prapod. "The Ascendancy of Therav?da Buddhism in Southeast Asia." Ph.D. diss. University of California, Berkeley, 1990.
Crosby, Kate. "Tantric Therav?da: A Bibliographic Essay on the Writings of François Bizot and Other Literature on the Yogavacara Tradition." Journal of Contemporary Buddhism 1, no. 2 (2000): 141–198.
Gombrich, R. F. Therav?da Buddhism: A Social History from Ancient Benares to Modern Colombo. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1988.
Gunawardana, R. A. L. H. Robe and Plough: Monasticism and Economic Interest in Early Medieval Sri Lanka. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1979.
Samuel, Geoffrey. Civilized Shamans: Buddhism in Tibetan Societies. Washington, DC, and London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1993.
Samuels, Jeffrey. "The Bodhisattva Ideal in Therav?da Buddhist Theory and Practices: A Re-evaluation of the Bodhisattva-?r?vaka Opposition." Philosophy East and West 47, no. 3 (1997): 399–415.
Smith, Bardwell L., ed. Religion and Legitimation of Power in Sri Lanka. Chambersburg, PA: ANIMA, 1978.
Spiro, Melford. Buddhism and Society: A Great Tradition and Its Burmese Vicissitudes. London: Allen and Unwin, 1971.
Swearer, Donald S. The Buddhist World of Southeast Asia, revised edition. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
Terwiel, B. J. Monks and Magic: An Analysis of Religious Ceremonies in Central Thailand (1975), 3rd revised edition. Bangkok, Thailand: White Lotus Press, 1994.
Kate Crosby