Na?man of Kosov

views updated

NA?MAN OF KOSOV

NA?MAN OF KOSOV (d. 1746), kabbalist and one of the early ?asidim. A wealthy land contractor and grain dealer, he lived for a time in Ludomir (Vladimir *Volynsky) where he built a bet midrash with adjoining bathhouse; Na?man was associated with a group of ?asidim in Kutow (Kuty) which was active even before the appearance of *Israel b. Eliezer Ba'al Shem Tov and possibly remained independent of him even later. At first Na?man was opposed to the Ba'al Shem Tov, refusing to accept him as a religious leader. Even after recognizing the latter's authority Na?man preserved his spiritual independence, and his connections with the Ba'al Shem Tov were apparently weak. It is known that among the Kutow group "there was a condition that none of them should prophesy" (Shiv?ei ha-Besht) but Nahman did not always observe this condition. He was considered a "man of the spirit," possessing contemplative power and known for his ecstatic manner of praying; he was one of the first to introduce into public prayer the Nosa? ha-Ari (prayer rite of Isaac *Luria).

Na?man was among the foremost teachers of devotion (*devekut), emphasizing constant contemplation of God; devekut, according to him, does not contradict the requirements of social life and is not confined to moments of spiritual concentration or a propitious occasion. It is carried out by a visual technique, the letters of the Tetragrammaton and the other names of God appearing before the eyes of the person meditating (the visual method of seeing letters). Na?man recognized the importance of the dialectical fabric of a society composed of "men of matter" (the masses) and "men of form" (i.e., of the spirit), holding that man's spiritual elevation from his lowliness will take place by his association with the great and pious. Everyone should aim at progress toward perfection day by day and a gradual ascent through completeness and unity of will and intention (kavvanah). Na?man admitted the struggle in man's soul between the powers which are his good and evil inclinations. Life is like a "running and returning" (Ezek. 1:14), with ascents and descents; sometimes what seems to be an ascent is actually a descent, but the descents are prerequisites of the ascents and are not absolutely evil, for "intellect proceeds from instinct and spiritual desire from physical desire" (?afenat Pa'ne'a?, 38a).

Na?man was suspected of Shabbateanism and since he supported Jonathan *Eybeschuetz, Jacob *Emden publicly censured him as "Na?man Kosover, the ignoramus of the Shabbatean sect" (Emden, Peta? Einayim, 14b; Sefer Hitabbekut (1862), 20b). However there is no real proof that Na?man was a Shabbatean. His teachings are cited in Toledot Ya'akov Yosef by Jacob Joseph of Polonnoye, in Shiv?ei ha-Besht (Horodezky ed. (1922), 56–57), etc.

bibliography:

A.J. Heschel, in: H.A. Wolfson Jubilee Volume (Heb., 1965), 113–41; J.G. Weiss, in: jjs, 8 (1957), 199–213; G. Scholem, in: Tarbiz, 20 (1949), 234, 239.

[Esther (Zweig) Liebes]

More From encyclopedia.com